Special Interest Group of the MAA
RUMEonline! RUMEonline! |
SIGMAA on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Information on publishing RUME |
Since I believe a lot of others who may want information on where to publish, here is as much information as I personally can gather up.
But first, some general advice. It is not a good idea to complete a manuscript before you decide which journal to submit to. Not only is it a question of APA style, etc., but different journals publish different kinds of articles. I know from serving on the JRME Editorial Panel that manuscripts that are generic or "recycled" do not usually make a good impression on the reviewers (a.k.a. referees). Of course, if one truly has the exceptional paper that moves the field forward, reviewers would still give a positive review.
Annie Selden
ARUME Coordinator
Annie's List (in no particular order)
Other journals (besides JRME) that publish articles related to mathematical teaching, learning, pedagogy, etc. (again, in no particular order):
Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education -- a set of volumes that appears when a sufficient number of good papers have been submitted.
Alan H. Schoenfeld
School of Education
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
e-mail: alans@socrates.berkeley.edu
Jim Kaput
Department of Mathematics
University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth
North Dartmouth, MA 02747
e-mail: JKAPUT@umassd.edu
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Mathematics Education Research Journal
Additional journals, subsequently added to the list by Annie:
The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education
The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education is an international forum for the publication of articles written in a variety of styles, including (but not limited to): research investigations using experimental, qualitative, ethnographic, historical, philosophical or case study approaches; critical reviews of the literature; policy perspectives; and position papers, curriculum arguments and discussion of issues in teacher education. For further information, contact the Editors at OISE/University of Toronto, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V6, Canada.
Alan Schoenfeld's note:
Hi All,
---'s note raises some important issues. I'm glad Annie Selden has responded, because she said some of the things I wanted to say. Let me echo them, and say a bit more.
It's the case in mathematics, but much more the case in education, that journals have their own styles and values. For example, there are articles I would submit to the Journal for Research in Math Ed (JRME) but not to the Journal of Mathematical Behavior (JMB), and vice versa. More importantly, given a particular body of data, I would write the work up differently if I were thinking about submitting it to JRME or JMB.
As an editor and a member of numerous editorial boards, I can tell you that I've gotten a huge number of submissions that I've recommended be rejected out of hand - because the content, or the way the article was written, didn't fit the journal. When it's clear that the author hasn't done the least bit of "homework," reviewers get offended: whether it's justifiable or not, their attitude is, "why should I labor over my review when the author didn't even take the trouble to check out the journal?"
The bottom line: do your homework. That means more than just getting the instructions for authors, which often cover technicalities (length, format) and a few fundamental principles (for example, Research in Collegiate Math Ed, which I co-edit with Ed Dubinsky and Jim Kaput, wants manuscripts that can be read by both mathematicians and education researchers, meaning that jargon should be kept to a minimum). Getting the instructions for authors is step 1. Step 2, which is much more important, is to go to the library (or interlibrary loan) and take out 3 or 4 issues of the journal. Read them! Look at the articles, see what the general organization is, what kinds of arguments and data they tend to favor. One journal may tend to publish statistical data, and be short on interpretation; another may do statistics, but have lots of interpretation; another may be happy to accept "qualitative" data, but want multiple lines of interpretive argument... (Along another dimension, a particular journal may publish all its articles beginning with 150-word abstracts. Imagine the what goes through reviewers' minds if your article doesn't have one...).
Think about your data, and about which journal seems most suited for them. Then write up your article in the style that (a) best does justice to the data, and (b) is best suited for the journal you've chosen. When the article is done, write a careful cover letter that indicates to the editor that some thought has gone into your choice of the journal. Having done so, you'll have a better paper, and you'll have increased the chance of seeing it published.
Cheers,
Alan Schoenfeld