Thursday | Friday Morning |
Friday Afternoon |
Saturday Morning |
Saturday Afternoon |
Next Session |
Previous Session |
Back to the top |
8:35 – 9:05 am |
Session 19
– Contributed Reports |
Marquis A |
Adaptations of learning glass solutions in undergraduate
STEM education Shawn Firouzian, Chris
Rasmussen and Matthew Anderson One
of the main issues STEM faculty face is promoting student success in
large-enrollment classes while simultaneously meeting studentsÕ and
administratorsÕ demands for the flexibility and economy of online and hybrid
classes. The Learning Glass is an innovative new instructional technology
that holds considerable promise for engaging students and improving learning
outcomes. In this report we share the results of an efficacy study between an
online calculus-based physics course using Learning Glass technology and a
large auditorium-style lecture hall taught via document projector. Both
courses were taught with the same instructor using identical content,
including exams and homework. Our quasi-experimental design involved
identical pre- and post-course assessments evaluating studentsÕ attitudes and
behavior towards science and their conceptual learning gains. Results are
promising, with equivalent learning gains for all students, including
minority and economically disadvantaged students. 65 |
Marquis B |
Pre-service teachers' meanings of area Sayonita Ghosh Hajra,
Betsy McNeal and David Bowers An
exploratory study was conducted of pre-service teachersÕ understanding of
area at a public university in the western United States. Forty-three
pre-service teachers took part in the study. Their definitions of area and
their responses to area-units tasks were recorded throughout the semester. We
found a wide gap between pre-service teachersÕ meaning of area and their use
of area-units. Initially, pre-service teachers had weak definitions of area.
Over the semester, these definitions were refined, but misconceptions about
area and area-units were illuminated in activities involving non-standard
units and areas of irregular regions. We conclude that, despite detailed
models of childrenÕs understanding of area, much work is needed to understand
the learning trajectories of pre-service teachers, particularly when
misconceptions exist. 33 |
Marquis C |
Personification as a lens into relationships with
mathematics Dov Zazkis and Ami Mamolo Personification
is the attribution of human qualities to non-human entities (Inagaki &
Hatano, 1987). Eliciting personification as a research method takes advantage
of a naturally occurring means through which (some) people discuss the
nuanced emotional relationships they have with those entities. In this paper,
we introduce the eliciting personification method for exploring individualsÕ
images of mathematics, as well as discuss an initial set of approaches for
analyzing the resulting data. Data from both pre-service teachers and
research mathematicians are discussed in order to illustrate the method. 35 |